2001FP DELL DRIVER DOWNLOAD

Home  /   2001FP DELL DRIVER DOWNLOAD

Some minor flaws in digital image quality. Although it has some minor flaws and shortcomings, the combination of features and performance for the price makes it an attractive choice. Its power consumption while on is a very low 90 watts, and this drops to under 3 watts in active-off, or standby, mode and less than 1 watt while powered off. I do audio conversion work and no games. If you’re a casual browser through our forums, you may note the dozens of inquiries about availability of low response time x LCDs. Although we certainly have our doubts about how important response time is at least once you start getting under 25ms , many die-hard gamers swear by 16ms timings.

Uploader: Nikozshura
Date Added: 24 May 2008
File Size: 70.71 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 65821
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

I give this monitor a good work out hrs a day never gets turned off and it still chugs along. The response time is a low 16ms and a refresh rate of 60Hz, making it ideal for gaming and video applications.

Excellent Monitor I have found that for an office situation, it is much more beneficial to use a full screen monitor than it is to use a widescreen monitor.

Dell UltraSharp 2001FP Preview: Gaming LCDs for the Masses

Dell had it pretty close with the FP but the only downside to that one was its bulk and weight. Front-panel icons are 2001ffp to read.

While x LCDs do exist Dell FP, for examplenone of them have been able to pack the punch as a 16ms response time offering. I’ve notitced that the monitor is a couple of years old. I actually use it on 2 machines analog input and digital input In my opinion – you probably can’t find a better quality monitor for this price – its a deal and thats about how I would sum it up. It is easy to keep clean and dust-free.

  AVERMEDIA AVERTV USB 2.0 VISTA DRIVER DOWNLOAD

Dell FP UltraSharp 20″ LCD Monitor – Grade B

My Feet Of Flames movie seems to play well. It also features a 4-port onboard USB 2. Some minor flaws in digital image quality.

Used it right out of the box. Whether you use it for work or play, this LCD del can handle it all. Most relevant reviews See all 64 reviews. I have had this one for over 3 years and it is still working perfectly with no issues.

Post Your Comment Please log in or sign up to comment.

Digital and analog connectors and cables. If you’re a casual browser through our 22001fp, you may note the dozens of inquiries about availability of low response time x LCDs. Dell FP at 20″ is maybe the best monitor I ever had. Guess the title sums it up. Although it has some minor flaws and shortcomings, the combination of features and performance for the price makes it an attractive choice.

Dell 2001FP LCD Monitor

201fp This monitor’s design is rounded out by mounting points for a soundbar and a standard Kensington lock slot on the monitor body. On the other hand, the Dell monitor outperformed the BenQ in terms of image quality with analog signals. The hardware itself is designed to be space efficient, leaving more of your desktop available for other things. The stands are a little different which does not matter to me.

  CMI8738 C3DXPCI AUDIO DEVICE DRIVER DOWNLOAD

The stand has the full range of adjustments: This is not a problem if you do not intend to use this feature, but if you do, you’ll need to get either a graphics card 2001f; supports this feature or use a third-party utility. When removed from the stand, rell monitor itself weighs a modest 12 lbs, allowing for easy wall and specialty mounting.

The LCD itself is equally impressive, featuring a resolution of by pixels. Dell Alienware 25″ The panel appears to be identical to the BenQ FP’sand both monitors offer a handy PIP feature to put the video image in a window on top of your computer data. On our tests using DisplayMate images www. I have found that for an office situation, it is much more beneficial to use a full screen monitor than it is to use a widescreen monitor.

They both showed similar excellent viewing-angle performance, as well as moderate smearing of moving images. We saw some faint banding on color ramps.